Comments on: The Davinci Code Sucks http://artsaypunk.com/2005/01/22/the-davinci-code-sucks/ Absent Minded Musings of a Lost Canadian Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:41:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: The Dave http://artsaypunk.com/2005/01/22/the-davinci-code-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-5 The Dave Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:06:00 +0000 http://artsaypunk.com/?p=6#comment-5 Another good point from Mark. That's the good thing about mark. You can always count on him to have the good points. Another good point from Mark. That’s the good thing about mark. You can always count on him to have the good points.

]]> By: mark http://artsaypunk.com/2005/01/22/the-davinci-code-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-4 mark Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:05:00 +0000 http://artsaypunk.com/?p=6#comment-4 I'd add that for a book that hinges on anti-Catholic misogyny the rote and well trod "male hero has to save female in distress while simultaneously explaining the basic plot elements to her" is kind of counteractive. I fully believe Dan Brown is a misogynist jackass. I’d add that for a book that hinges on anti-Catholic misogyny the rote and well trod “male hero has to save female in distress while simultaneously explaining the basic plot elements to her” is kind of counteractive. I fully believe Dan Brown is a misogynist jackass.

]]> By: The Dave http://artsaypunk.com/2005/01/22/the-davinci-code-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-3 The Dave Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:08:00 +0000 http://artsaypunk.com/?p=6#comment-3 Yeah, well, there's no doubt that the Catholic church designed itself in a mysonginistic image. I also don't doubt that Jesus was married, it would have made sense for a man of his standing at that time. What bothers me is the way the book melds facts and half-facts into this quasi-history that people think is true. The average reader won't actually look into the debate. But no, I lie, what really bothers me is how badly written the book is. I could forgive a lot if it were half decent. Yeah, well, there’s no doubt that the Catholic church designed itself in a mysonginistic image. I also don’t doubt that Jesus was married, it would have made sense for a man of his standing at that time. What bothers me is the way the book melds facts and half-facts into this quasi-history that people think is true. The average reader won’t actually look into the debate.
But no, I lie, what really bothers me is how badly written the book is. I could forgive a lot if it were half decent.

]]> By: André http://artsaypunk.com/2005/01/22/the-davinci-code-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2 André Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:29:00 +0000 http://artsaypunk.com/?p=6#comment-2 Yes and No, I agree partly with you. The effect the book had on people thinking about the issue of Jesus life. That it may not have been as the bible tels us. In our everyday life we don't sit down and think about this for ourselves. The book breaks your picture and forces you to take a stand. The churche has put women down... has it done so on purpose? WOW sorry but I never looked at it that way... <a HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.preaching.myrss.nl" rel="nofollow">The Preacher</A> Yes and No,

I agree partly with you. The effect the book had on people thinking about the issue of Jesus life. That it may not have been as the bible tels us. In our everyday life we don’t sit down and think about this for ourselves. The book breaks your picture and forces you to take a stand. The churche has put women down… has it done so on purpose? WOW sorry but I never looked at it that way…

The Preacher

]]>